Skip to content

Study, 2017

Are women over-diagnosed with mental illness because of psychiatry's gender bias?

The author argues yes. Women, particularly those who are working-class, Black, older, or lesbian, are at higher risk of over-diagnosis. PMS and PMDD are used as examples of how normal female biology gets labeled as mental illness.

Early or limited evidence Not applicable - this is a critical analysis, not a study of people

What they did

This is a critical analysis of how psychiatry has historically treated women. The author examines how psychiatric experts have pathologized normal female behavior and argues that financial interests and power dynamics play a role in diagnosis and treatment.

What they found

Women have not been more mad than men but have been misdiagnosed and mistreated. PMS and PMDD are examples of normal changes in mood and behavior during the menstrual cycle being redefined as psychiatric disorders. Labeling these normal processes as mental illness affects how women's behavior is subsequently judged. After the 1960s-1970s, hysteria became less common as a diagnosis, but similar issues persist with PMDD and PMS.

What it means for you

This argues that PMS and PMDD may not be mental illnesses but rather normal female biology that has been pathologized by psychiatry. The author raises questions about whether psychiatric diagnosis serves women's interests or experts' financial interests. This is a critical theoretical argument rather than an empirical study.

About the study

Original title
A critical feminist analysis of madness : pathologising femininity through psychiatric discourse
Authors
Jane Maria Ussher
Year
2017
Study design
Study
What was tested
Not applicable - critical theoretical analysis

Topics