Skip to content

Survey study, 2022

Is brain visual processing different in people with PMDD?

Yes. Women with PMDD showed abnormal patterns in how their visual brain responded to stimuli, especially during the luteal phase, suggesting an imbalance between brain excitation and inhibition.

Early or limited evidence Women with PMDD and healthy controls (exact sample size not clearly stated in abstract)

What they did

Women with PMDD and control women were studied twice: once during the follicular phase and once during the luteal phase. Brain electrical activity was recorded while they watched visual patterns moving at different speeds: static, slow, medium, and fast.

What they found

Women with PMDD showed reduced brain response suppression specifically during the luteal phase when visual patterns changed from slow to medium speed. They also showed stronger than normal responses to pattern changes in both phases. Visual perception of spatial suppression decreased from follicular to luteal phase only in PMDD. Brain response frequency did not differ between groups.

What it means for you

The visual part of the brain in PMDD may be overexcited, especially during the luteal phase, which could relate to symptom severity. The specific mechanism isn't fully understood from this study. This is highly technical brain research; its relevance to everyday symptoms needs further investigation.

2

menstrual phases tested

4

drift rates tested

About the study

Original title
Altered visual cortex excitability in premenstrual dysphoric disorder: Evidence from magnetoencephalographic gamma oscillations and perceptual suppression
Authors
Manyukhina VO, Orekhova EV, Prokofyev AO et al.
Journal
PloS one
Year
2022
Study design
Survey study
What was tested
Brain response testing during visual stimuli; no treatment tested
Open access
Yes
Original abstract

Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a psychiatric condition characterized by extreme mood shifts during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle (MC) due to abnormal sensitivity to neurosteroids and unbalanced neural excitation/inhibition (E/I) ratio. We hypothesized that in women with PMDD in the luteal phase, these factors would alter the frequency of magnetoencephalographic visual gamma oscillations, affect modulation of their power by excitatory drive, and decrease perceptual spatial suppression. Women with PMDD and control women were examined twice-during the follicular and luteal phases of their MC. We recorded visual gamma response (GR) while modulating the excitatory drive by increasing the drift rate of the high-contrast grating (static, 'slow', 'medium', and 'fast'). Contrary to our expectations, GR frequency was not affected in women with PMDD in either phase of the MC. GR power suppression, which is normally associated with a switch from the 'optimal' for GR slow drift rate to the medium drift rate, was reduced in women with PMDD and was the only GR parameter that distinguished them from control participants specifically in the luteal phase and predicted severity of their premenstrual symptoms. Over and above the atypical luteal GR suppression, in both phases of the MC women with PMDD had abnormally strong GR facilitation caused by a switch from the 'suboptimal' static to the 'optimal' slow drift rate. Perceptual spatial suppression did not differ between the groups but decreased from the follicular to the luteal phase only in PMDD women. The atypical modulation of GR power suggests that neuronal excitability in the visual cortex is constitutively elevated in PMDD and that this E/I imbalance is further exacerbated during the luteal phase. However, the unaltered GR frequency does not support the hypothesis of inhibitory neuron dysfunction in PMDD.

Reproduced under CC-BY.

Topics