Skip to content

Survey study, 2026

Does the French version of the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire work reliably?

Yes. The French version is reliable and valid for measuring menstrual distress in French-speaking women, though French women reported higher symptom scores than English and Italian versions, particularly about period bleeding.

Moderate study design 266 French-speaking women aged 18-50

What they did

Cross-sectional validation study. The questionnaire was translated from English to French with cultural adaptation, then tested with 266 French-speaking women aged 18-50. Researchers checked consistency over time and whether it matched other wellbeing questionnaires.

What they found

The French version showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.84, McDonald's ω = 0.86) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.94). It correlated significantly with age, psychological distress, and premenstrual symptoms. French-speaking women had higher average scores than previous Italian and English validations, particularly on items about menstrual bleeding distress and feelings of being dirty.

What it means for you

The French version is a reliable tool for measuring menstrual distress in French-speaking women. The higher scores suggest cultural differences in how women experience or report period-related distress, which researchers need to investigate further.

266

French-speaking women tested

0.84

internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha)

0.94

test-retest reliability (ICC)

About the study

Original title
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the menstrual distress questionnaire (MEDI-Q)
Authors
Cassioli E, Cassioli F, Bellaert N et al.
Journal
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Year
2026
Study design
Survey study
Participants
266
What was tested
Validation of French translation of Menstrual Distress Questionnaire
Open access
Yes

Topics