Study, 2024
Can a screening tool help identify women with PMS at work?
Yes. Researchers developed a 27-item questionnaire that successfully identifies women with PMS and predicts which ones might miss work. Of 3,239 working women, 10% had experienced PMS and 12% had taken sick leave because of symptoms.
What they did
Researchers recruited 3,239 working women through an internet survey in October 2021. They asked 47 questions about premenstrual symptoms and analyzed the responses to create a shorter screening tool. They tested whether the new tool could predict who would take time off work.
What they found
Of the 3,239 women, 331 (10%) had experienced PMS and 393 had taken sick leave due to PMS symptoms. The final screening tool had 27 questions in four areas: physical response symptoms (13 items), emotional and mood symptoms (6 items), difficulty getting work done (5 items), and abdominal and digestive symptoms (3 items). The tool correctly identified 78% of women who actually missed work and correctly identified 57% of women who did not miss work.
What it means for you
This screening tool could help employers and healthcare providers identify women experiencing PMS who might need support at work. The main limits are that responses came from internet surveys so may not represent all working women, and the tool was not perfect at identifying who would actually need time off work.
3,239
working women surveyed
10%
had experienced PMS
27
questions in final screening tool
About the study
- Original title
- Development of a premenstrual syndrome scale for workplaces
- Authors
- Takenoshita C, Shimizu K, Iida M et al.
- Journal
- Research Square
- Year
- 2024
- Study design
- Study
- Participants
- 3,239
- What was tested
- None - questionnaire development and validation study
- Open access
- Yes
- Read the paper
- doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4197315/v1
Original abstract
Abstract We aimed to develop a new screening tool for premenstrual syndrome (PMS) to be used in the workplace. In October 2021, we recruited 3,239 working women with menstruation via an internet research company and asked 47 questions about PMS-related symptoms. Of the participants, 331 women had experienced PMS (10%), and 393 women had taken sick leave because of PMS-associated symptoms. Explanatory factor analyses with maximum likelihood and Promax rotation identified four domains with 27 items, including "Autonomic dysfunction symptoms'' (13 items, Cronbach’s α = 0.93), "Psychiatric symptoms" (6 items, Cronbach’s α = 0.94), "Lack of work efficiency" (5 items, Cronbach’s α = 0.93), and “Abdominal symptoms” (3 items, Cronbach’s α = 0.95). Using a split-half sample for the confirmatory factor analysis, moderately fit model indices for the four-factor solution were confirmed. We also confirmed the developed scale’s criterion validity using existing PMS screening criteria and its concurrent validity through high correlation coefficients with Copenhagen Burnout Inventory scores. The receiver operating characteristic curve yielded a good predictive ability for work absenteeism, including a sensitivity of 78%, a specificity of 57%, and an area under the curve of 0.735. A highly reliable and valid new scale for PMS was developed with efficacy for screening for work absenteeism.
Reproduced under CC-BY.
Topics
Related studies
Review, 2026
How well do SSRIs treat PMS?
Cohort study, 2026
Is PMS becoming more common and more disabling worldwide?
Systematic review, 2026
Are hormone levels different in women with PMS?
Systematic review, 2026
Do mindfulness and relaxation techniques help with PMS symptoms?
Systematic review, 2026
Why do some women experience mood changes linked to their menstrual cycle?
Randomised trial, 2025
Do essential oils reduce PMS symptoms?