Skip to content

Study, 2024

Can a screening tool help identify women with PMS at work?

Yes. Researchers developed a 27-item questionnaire that successfully identifies women with PMS and predicts which ones might miss work. Of 3,239 working women, 10% had experienced PMS and 12% had taken sick leave because of symptoms.

Moderate study design 3,239 working women recruited via internet survey

What they did

Researchers recruited 3,239 working women through an internet survey in October 2021. They asked 47 questions about premenstrual symptoms and analyzed the responses to create a shorter screening tool. They tested whether the new tool could predict who would take time off work.

What they found

Of the 3,239 women, 331 (10%) had experienced PMS and 393 had taken sick leave due to PMS symptoms. The final screening tool had 27 questions in four areas: physical response symptoms (13 items), emotional and mood symptoms (6 items), difficulty getting work done (5 items), and abdominal and digestive symptoms (3 items). The tool correctly identified 78% of women who actually missed work and correctly identified 57% of women who did not miss work.

What it means for you

This screening tool could help employers and healthcare providers identify women experiencing PMS who might need support at work. The main limits are that responses came from internet surveys so may not represent all working women, and the tool was not perfect at identifying who would actually need time off work.

3,239

working women surveyed

10%

had experienced PMS

27

questions in final screening tool

About the study

Original title
Development of a premenstrual syndrome scale for workplaces
Authors
Takenoshita C, Shimizu K, Iida M et al.
Journal
Research Square
Year
2024
Study design
Study
Participants
3,239
What was tested
None - questionnaire development and validation study
Open access
Yes
Original abstract

Abstract We aimed to develop a new screening tool for premenstrual syndrome (PMS) to be used in the workplace. In October 2021, we recruited 3,239 working women with menstruation via an internet research company and asked 47 questions about PMS-related symptoms. Of the participants, 331 women had experienced PMS (10%), and 393 women had taken sick leave because of PMS-associated symptoms. Explanatory factor analyses with maximum likelihood and Promax rotation identified four domains with 27 items, including "Autonomic dysfunction symptoms'' (13 items, Cronbach’s α = 0.93), "Psychiatric symptoms" (6 items, Cronbach’s α = 0.94), "Lack of work efficiency" (5 items, Cronbach’s α = 0.93), and “Abdominal symptoms” (3 items, Cronbach’s α = 0.95). Using a split-half sample for the confirmatory factor analysis, moderately fit model indices for the four-factor solution were confirmed. We also confirmed the developed scale’s criterion validity using existing PMS screening criteria and its concurrent validity through high correlation coefficients with Copenhagen Burnout Inventory scores. The receiver operating characteristic curve yielded a good predictive ability for work absenteeism, including a sensitivity of 78%, a specificity of 57%, and an area under the curve of 0.735. A highly reliable and valid new scale for PMS was developed with efficacy for screening for work absenteeism.

Reproduced under CC-BY.

Topics