Skip to content

Randomised trial, 2011

Does taking essential fatty acids help treat PMS?

Yes, taking 2 grams of essential fatty acids significantly reduced PMS symptoms by the 6th month, with greater improvement than the 1-gram dose. Placebo also improved symptoms but less dramatically by month 6.

Strong study design 120 women with PMS

What they did

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with 120 women with PMS. Women were divided into three groups and took 1 gram of essential fatty acids, 2 grams, or placebo daily. Symptoms were tracked using a calendar over 6 months.

What they found

In the 1-gram group, PMS symptom scores dropped from 99 to 58 at 3 months and to 35 at 6 months. In the 2-gram group, scores dropped from 98 to 48 to 28. Placebo dropped from 96.5 to 63.5 to 62. The 2-gram group had the greatest improvement. Prolactin and cholesterol levels did not change.

What it means for you

Essential fatty acids, especially at 2 grams, appear to help PMS more than placebo. The main limitation is that placebo also helped, so some improvement may not be from the medication. The study did not find effects on hormone or cholesterol levels.

120

Women studied

6 months

Duration

98 to 28

2g group: baseline to 6 months

About the study

Original title
Essential fatty acids for premenstrual syndrome and their effect on prolactin and total cholesterol levels: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study
Authors
Rocha Filho EA, Lima JC, Pinho Neto JS et al.
Journal
Reproductive health
Year
2011
Study design
Randomised trial
Participants
120
What was tested
1 or 2 grams of essential fatty acids or placebo daily
Open access
Yes
Original abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of polyunsaturated fatty acids for the treatment of the premenstrual syndrome (PMS) using a graded symptom scale and to assess the effect of this treatment on basal plasma levels of prolactin and total cholesterol. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted with 120 women with PMS divided into three groups and treated with 1 or 2 grams of the medication or placebo. Symptoms were recorded over a 6-month period using the Prospective Record of the Impact and Severity of Menstruation (PRISM) calendar. Total cholesterol and prolactin levels were measured. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson's chi-square test, Wilcoxon's nonparametric signed-rank test for paired samples and the Mann-Whitney nonparametric test for independent samples were used in the statistical analysis. Results: There were no differences in age, marital status, schooling or ethnicity between the groups. In the group treated with 1 gram of the medication, a significant reduction was found when the median PRISM score recorded in the luteal phase at baseline (99) was compared with the median score recorded in the 3rd month (58) and in the 6th month of evaluation (35). In the 2-gram group, these differences were even more significant (baseline score: 98; 3rd month: 48; 6th month: 28). In the placebo group, there was a significant reduction at the 3rd but not at the 6th month (baseline: 96.5; 3rd month: 63.5; 6th month: 62). The difference between the phases of the menstrual cycle was greater in the 2-gram group compared to the group treated with 1 gram of the medication. There were no statistically significant differences in prolactin or total cholesterol levels between baseline values and those recorded after six months of treatment. Conclusion: The difference between the groups using the medication and the placebo group with respect to the improvement in symptomatology appears to indicate the effectiveness of the drug. Improvement in symptoms was higher when the 2-gram dose was used. This medication was not associated with any changes in prolactin or total cholesterol levels in these women.

Reproduced under CC-BY.

Topics