Skip to content

Survey study, 2023

Does PMS severity affect how well undergraduate medical students perform in school?

Yes. Students with higher PMS severity had significantly worse academic performance compared to those with milder PMS.

Early or limited evidence 49 undergraduate medical students in Pakistan, mean age 22.65 years

What they did

Cross-sectional survey of 49 undergraduate medical students who provided information about demographics, menstrual history, body mass index, and PMS severity. Academic performance was classified as good or poor.

What they found

46.9% of students had higher PMS severity. Students with higher PMS scores had significantly worse academic performance. Students with poor grades scored 30.17 on the PMS scale versus 23.94 for students with good grades (p<0.001).

What it means for you

Severe PMS is linked to worse school performance. The main limitation is the small sample size at one medical school, so these results may not apply more broadly.

49

Medical students studied

46.9%

With higher PMS severity

30.17 vs 23.94

PMS score in poor vs good students

About the study

Original title
Impact of Pre-Menstrual Syndrome on Academic Performance of Undergraduates Medical Students
Authors
Maroofa Habib, Ifrah Gul, Aqsa Iqbal et al.
Journal
Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Year
2023
Study design
Survey study
Participants
49
What was tested
None - observational study
Open access
Yes
Original abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate the effect of PMS on the academic performance of undergraduate medical students. Materials & Methods: The present study was cross sectional and analytical involving 49 undergraduate medical students. A structured proforma was used to gather information about the demographic characteristics, menstrual history, and body mass index (BMI), as well as information about the severity of premenstrual symptoms. The severity of premenstrual syndrome was determined by a premenstrual symptom score and the participants divided into lower and higher PMS severity groups. Students' academic performance was divided into good and poor performance groups. The data were analyzed statistically by using the methods similar to the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Where appropriate, the chi-square test was used and independent sample t-test was used, p<0.05 being statistically significant. Results: The mean age of participants was 22.65 ± 1.52 years, while the mean BMI was 23.66 ± 2.03 kg/m². The mean age at menarche was 12.08 ± 1.09 years, and the overall mean PMS score was 26.22 ± 3.99. Of the participants 26 (53.1%) were classified into the lower group of severity of PMS and 23 (46.9%) were classified into the higher group of severity of PMS. The good academic performance was noted among 31 (63.3%) students while the poor academic performance was noted among 18 (36.7%) students. There was a statistically significant relationship between the level of severity of PMS and academic performance (p<0.001). Academically poor students scored significantly higher on the PMS than did good academic students (30.17 ± 2.76 vs 23.94 ± 2.31; p<0.001). Conclusion: Undergraduate medical students are highly affected by PMS and suffer in their academic performance. The higher the level of severity of the PMS, the poorer the academic outcomes. Recognizing the importance of early identification, awareness initiatives, and suitable care and management practices, can lead to better learning outcomes and general health for students who are impacted. Keywords: PMS; academic performance; medical students; menstrual health; and severity of PMS.

Reproduced under CC-BY.

Topics