Skip to content

Interview study, 2025

What are healthcare experiences like for women with premenstrual symptoms in the UK?

Most women felt their care was poor, with doctors dismissing symptoms and lacking knowledge. Care improved when doctors took symptoms seriously.

Early or limited evidence 332 UK women (mean age 34.66, mostly white/Caucasian) who sought help for premenstrual symptoms

What they did

Online survey of 332 women who had sought help for premenstrual symptoms. Mean age was 34.66 years. They answered questions about their healthcare experiences and what improvements they wanted.

What they found

75.22% (255 women) felt care was poor. 44.25% (150) felt their symptoms were not taken seriously. 37.76% (128) perceived lack of healthcare professional knowledge. 84.96% (288) did not receive recommendations for websites or support groups. 74.63% (253) did not get advice about lifestyle changes.

What it means for you

Doctors need better training about premenstrual symptoms. Many women are not being heard or helped. The study was done through social media, so the women surveyed may not represent all women with premenstrual symptoms in the UK.

75.22%

felt care was poor

44.25%

felt symptoms not taken seriously

37.76%

perceived lack of professional knowledge

About the study

Original title
Improving care experiences for premenstrual symptoms and disorders in the United Kingdom (UK): a mixed-methods approach
Authors
Funnell EL, Martin-Key NA, Bahn S
Journal
BMC health services research
Year
2025
Study design
Interview study
Participants
332
What was tested
None
Open access
Yes
Original abstract

Background: Poor care experiences are reported for premenstrual disorders, which may result in negative outcomes such as distress, reduced healthcare engagement, and delays to diagnosis. This research aimed to explore healthcare experiences for premenstrual symptoms in the United Kingdom and identify areas for potential improvements based on participant responses. Method: An online survey was delivered, with participants recruited via social media. Experiences of care were explored using quantitative and qualitative questions. Quantitative data were explored using descriptive statistics, with group differences investigated using Mann-Whitney U tests and chi-square tests as appropriate. Qualitative data regarding care improvements was explored using inductive thematic analysis. Results: The sample included 339 participants who completed at least 97% of the survey, reported premenstrual symptoms in consecutive cycles, and had sought formal help for these symptoms. Mean age was 34.66 (SD = 5.88), with the majority identifying as women (n = 332, 97.94%) and white/Caucasian (n = 311, 91.74%). 75.22% (n = 255) felt that care was poor. 44.25% (n = 150) felt their symptoms were not taken seriously. 37.76% perceived a lack of healthcare professional knowledge (n = 128). The majority did not receive recommendations of non-formal sources of help (i.e., websites, support groups; 84.96%, n = 288) or lifestyle changes (74.63%, n = 253). Better care experiences were associated with healthcare professionals taking symptoms seriously (U = 1383.00, p 2 = 48.251, df = 1, p 2 = 7.849, df = 1, p = .005, Φc = .152). Thematic analysis revealed 8 aspects of care improvement: Empathetic care provision; Healthcare professional education, understanding, and research; Comprehensive symptom assessment and investigations; Diagnosis; Professional support and treatment provision; Signposting or referral to additional resources or sources of help; Wider healthcare system improvements; and Patient role/voice and preferences. Conclusions: Poor care experiences for premenstrual symptoms in the UK are characterised by dismissive attitudes and perceived lack of knowledge. Improved training provision for healthcare professionals is required to address this and other aspects of care identified by qualitative analysis. However, research is needed to identify appropriate methods to deliver training. Utilisation of standardised screening tools and patient-centred communication will likely ensure comprehensive assessments and reduce self-advocacy burdens.

Reproduced under CC-BY.

Topics