Skip to content

Cohort study, 1979

Are menstrual symptoms caused by beliefs about the menstrual cycle?

This is a theoretical review arguing that some menstrual symptoms may originate from biased beliefs and selective processing of menstrual cycle information, not just from physical changes. It is not original research.

Early or limited evidence This is a literature review, not a study of specific people

What they did

The authors reviewed existing research on menstrual symptoms and examined evidence that symptom associations may reflect biased beliefs and selective attention to cycle-related information rather than being purely physiological.

What they found

The review suggests that biases in how people process information about the menstrual cycle may originate and maintain symptom associations. These biases include selective attention to cycle-related information, how meaningful the cycle feels, and how evidence is interpreted. Mechanisms include distortion, autonomy, and category accessibility of the evidence.

What it means for you

This theoretical perspective suggests that cultural beliefs and how women process information about their menstrual cycle may partly shape symptom experiences. This does not mean symptoms are not real, but rather that beliefs, expectations, and attention also play a role. This is a conceptual review rather than new evidence from a study.

About the study

Original title
Menstrual symptoms: a social cognition analysis
Authors
Ruble DN, Brooks-Gunn J
Journal
Journal of behavioral medicine
Year
1979
Study design
Cohort study
What was tested
None; this is a literature review article

Topics