Review, 1987
Should PMDD be a separate psychiatric diagnosis?
This was debated during development of the DSM-III-R. Some experts felt PMDD was a real but rare condition, while feminist groups worried that listing it as a psychiatric disorder would inappropriately label women as mentally ill.
What they did
Review of the controversy that occurred during revision of the DSM-III-R regarding whether to include Premenstrual Phase Dysphoric Disorder as a separate psychiatric diagnosis.
What they found
Some scientists studying PMS felt it was a real disorder occurring relatively rarely. Significant disagreement existed about whether a psychiatric diagnosis would inappropriately label women as mentally ill or provide needed recognition.
What it means for you
Experts disagreed about whether recognizing PMDD as a psychiatric disorder would help women or stigmatize them. This is a review of a policy debate, not research evidence about PMS itself.
About the study
- Original title
- Premenstrual syndrome : ethical and legal implications in a biomedical perspective
- Authors
- Benson E. Ginsburg, Bonnie Frank Carter
- Journal
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)
- Year
- 1987
- Study design
- Review
- What was tested
- Not applicable - this is about diagnostic classification
- Read the paper
- doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5275-4
Topics
Related studies
Survey study, 2026
Are PMS and PMDD linked to suicidal thoughts and violence toward family?
Survey study, 2026
How common are PMS and PMDD in teenagers, and can a new questionnaire measure their impact?
Cohort study, 2022
Do adverse childhood experiences increase risk of PMS and PMDD?
Case-control study, 2007
Do women with PMDD see emotions in faces differently during the luteal phase?
Survey study, 2014
Should PMDD be included as an official diagnosis in psychiatric manuals?
Survey study, 2011
Does experiencing discrimination increase the risk of PMDD?