Case-control study, 2020
Do women with moderate-to-severe PMS process rewards differently?
Yes. In the luteal phase (before menstruation), women with moderate-to-severe PMS responded less to rewards than women without PMS. There was no difference in the follicular phase (after menstruation).
What they did
Case-control study where 30 women with moderate-to-severe PMS and 31 women without PMS completed a reward task at two different cycle phases: the luteal phase and the follicular phase.
What they found
In the late luteal phase, women with PMS had lower response rates and lower accuracy when responding to frequently rewarded stimuli compared to controls. These differences disappeared in the follicular phase. The differences remained even when researchers controlled for anhedonia (inability to feel pleasure).
What it means for you
Women with moderate-to-severe PMS may have differences in how their brains respond to rewards, especially before menstruation. This is preliminary evidence from a relatively small study.
30
women with moderate-to-severe PMS
31
control women without PMS
About the study
- Original title
- Reduced Reward Responsiveness in Women With Moderate - to - Severe Premenstrual Syndrome: Evidence From a Probabilistic Reward Task
- Authors
- Hou L, Chang L, Chen L et al.
- Journal
- Frontiers in psychiatry
- Year
- 2020
- Study design
- Case-control study
- Participants
- 30
- What was tested
- Probabilistic reward task (a test that assesses how people respond to rewards)
- Open access
- Yes
- Read the paper
- doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00028
Original abstract
Nearly 50% of women of reproductive age worldwide experience premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Women with PMS exhibit low positive affect and low frontal electroencephalography asymmetry scores, both of which are associated with reward processing. These findings suggest that women with PMS may exhibit deficiencies in reward processing. A probabilistic reward task based on signal detection approach was used to assess reward responsiveness in 30 women with moderate-to-severe PMS and 31 controls without PMS. The results revealed that in the late luteal phase, the women with moderate-to-severe PMS exhibited lower response bias and lower hit rate toward more frequently rewarded stimuli (rich stimuli) than the controls. By contrast, the response bias and hit rate did not differ between the two groups in the follicular phase. The group differences still remained after controlling for anhedonic symptoms. Furthermore, trial-by-trial probability analyses revealed that women with moderate-to-severe PMS exhibited a trend of having a higher miss rate for rich stimuli than the controls. In particular, when a rich stimulus was preceded by an infrequently rewarded stimulus (a rewarded lean stimulus), participants in the PMS group exhibited a trend for higher miss rate than those in the control group in the late luteal and follicular phases. However, group differences in the probability analyses were nonsignificant after controlling for anhedonic symptoms. These results provide preliminary evidence that women with moderate-to-severe PMS exhibit dysfunctional reward responsiveness and impaired ability to modulate their behavior as a function of prior reinforcement.
Reproduced under CC-BY.
Topics
Related studies
Cohort study, 2026
What genetic factors are linked to premenstrual symptoms?
Systematic review, 2026
How often do mood disorders and PMS or PMDD occur together?
Randomised trial, 2026
Does Kundalini Reiki help reduce PMS symptoms and improve quality of life?
Cohort study, 2026
Does having PMS before pregnancy increase the risk of postpartum depression?
Systematic review, 2026
Does vitamin D supplementation help PMS symptoms?
Study, 2026
How do women with PMDD process emotions differently in their brains?