Skip to content

Case-control study, 2014

Does PMDD change how the brain reacts to upsetting social situations?

Yes, in this small study. Women with PMDD showed stronger brain reactions to upsetting social images than non-social ones in the late luteal phase, compared with women without PMDD.

Early or limited evidence 14 women with PMDD and 13 healthy women

What they did

Researchers used brain scans (fMRI) while 14 women with PMDD and 13 healthy women viewed negative images, some showing social situations and some not. Scans were taken at two points in the cycle: mid-follicular and late luteal phase.

What they found

In the late luteal phase, women with PMDD had stronger activity in the amygdala and insula (emotion areas) to social negative images than non-social ones, but weaker activity in a brain area that helps control emotion, compared with healthy women. The connection between these emotion and control areas worked in opposite directions in the two groups, and changes in progesterone were linked to the stronger amygdala reaction in women with PMDD.

What it means for you

PMDD may involve the brain reacting more strongly to social stress specifically, possibly tied to sensitivity to progesterone, rather than to negative events in general. This is a small, preliminary study, so results need confirming in larger groups.

14

Women with PMDD

13

Healthy controls

About the study

Original title
Social stimulation and corticolimbic reactivity in premenstrual dysphoric disorder: a preliminary study
Authors
Gingnell M, Ahlstedt V, Bannbers E et al.
Journal
Biology of mood & anxiety disorders
Year
2014
Study design
Case-control study
What was tested
Brain imaging (fMRI) during exposure to social and non-social negative images (no treatment tested)
Open access
Yes
Original abstract

Background: Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), characterized by luteal phase-induced negative affect and loss of impulse control, often results in compromised social interactions. Although amygdala activation is generally linked to negative affect, increased amygdala reactivity to aversive stimuli in the luteal phase has not been consistently reported in PMDD. We tested the hypothesis that amygdala hyper-reactivity in PMDD is symptom specific, rather than generalized, and linked to socially relevant stimuli. Blood oxygenation level dependent signal changes during exposure to negative images with social and non-social content were evaluated in the mid-follicular and late luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Fourteen women with PMDD and 13 healthy controls participated. Results: When compared with healthy controls, women with PMDD in the luteal phase had enhanced reactivity to social stimuli compared to non-social stimuli in the amygdala and insula, but attenuated reactivity in the anterior cingulate cortex. Functional couplings between emotion processing and controlling areas were significantly different, being positive in women with PMDD and negative in healthy controls. Changes in progesterone levels in women with PMDD correlated positively with altered amygdala reactivity. Conclusions: Socially relevant aversive stimulation elicited enhanced activity in affective processing brain regions that were functionally coupled to compromised activity in cognitive control areas. Because increased reactivity correlated positively with alterations in ovarian steroid levels, data preliminary support the hypothesis that enhanced progesterone sensitivity in PMDD affects corticolimbic processing of social emotions.

Reproduced under CC-BY.

Topics