Skip to content

Randomised trial, 2018

Does reading information about negative premenstrual changes make women report more negative symptoms?

Yes. Women who read text focusing only on negative changes reported significantly more negative and fewer positive premenstrual changes than those who read balanced information or no information.

Moderate study design 241 healthy university women at Philipps-University of Marburg.

What they did

A randomized experimental study of 241 healthy university women. Women were randomly assigned to read one of three texts: one with both positive and negative premenstrual changes, one with only negative changes, or a control text. After reading, they reported premenstrual changes they had experienced.

What they found

Women who read the negative-only text reported more negative premenstrual changes and fewer positive changes compared to those who read balanced or control text. Most women reported at least one positive premenstrual change across all groups.

What it means for you

What we read about premenstrual symptoms influences what we remember about our own experience. This demonstrates the power of negative messaging about menstruation. The study used healthy women without diagnosed PMS or PMDD, so findings may not apply to those with more severe symptoms. Results rely on retrospective reporting.

241

women studied

3

groups (balanced, negative, control)

2015

study year

About the study

Original title
The effect of manipulated information about premenstrual changes on the report of positive and negative premenstrual changes
Authors
Kues JN, Janda C, Krzikalla C et al.
Journal
Women & health
Year
2018
Study design
Randomised trial
Participants
241
What was tested
Reading text describing premenstrual changes (balanced, negative-only, or control).

Topics