Review, 1985
What do current studies tell us about PMS?
Despite many studies attempting to understand PMS, we are no closer to understanding its causes or finding effective treatments than when PMS was first described. Many studies have been poorly designed.
What they did
This is a literature review summarizing current and past theories about PMS causes and treatment approaches.
What they found
Studies on PMS have been hampered by uncontrolled therapeutic trials, poorly conducted biochemical and hormonal studies, and claims without supporting evidence. The background information needed to answer key questions about PMS is not yet established.
What it means for you
Research on PMS needs to be better designed. The scientific literature is filled with weaknesses and gaps. Doctors and researchers should learn from past mistakes and conduct clearer studies to provide real answers about PMS causes and treatments.
About the study
- Original title
- The premenstrual syndrome. A review
- Authors
- O'Brien PM
- Journal
- The Journal of reproductive medicine
- Year
- 1985
- Study design
- Review
- What was tested
- None - review of existing studies
- Read the paper
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3884803/
Topics
Related studies
Guideline, 2019
How should doctors treat PMS and PMDD?
Randomised trial, 2014
Does the combination of sumatriptan and naproxen sodium reduce menstrual symptoms and migraine?
Systematic review, 2013
Does Vitex (chaste tree) help PMS and PMDD symptoms?
Randomised trial, 2008
Does drospirenone with ethinyl estradiol birth control help PMDD?
Systematic review, 2008
What treatments work best for PMS and PMDD?
Systematic review, 2007
What treatments work for premenstrual syndrome?