Survey study, 2026
Does PMS affect how college students live their daily lives?
Yes. About 81% of students had severe PMS, and those with PMS had significantly lower lifestyle quality scores than those without (124 vs 131, p=0.002).
What they did
Cross-sectional study of 450 students at a medical university who completed questionnaires about PMS symptoms and overall lifestyle quality.
What they found
81.1% of students experienced severe PMS symptoms. The non-PMS group had a lifestyle score of 131.01 compared to 124.03 for the PMS group (p=0.002). There was a significant negative relationship between PMS severity and lifestyle (r=-0.236, p<0.001).
What it means for you
PMS affects how students function day to day across sleep, physical activity, and other lifestyle areas. The main limits are that this is from one university and uses only self-reported symptoms, so we cannot prove that PMS directly causes lifestyle problems.
81.1%
students with severe PMS
131.01 vs 124.03
lifestyle scores: non-PMS vs PMS
450
total students
About the study
- Original title
- Does premenstrual syndrome (PMS) affect the lifestyle of adolescent/young college students?
- Authors
- Zolfaghary F, Adib-Rad H, Karimihamzekolaee N et al.
- Journal
- International journal of adolescent medicine and health
- Year
- 2026
- Study design
- Survey study
- Participants
- 450
- What was tested
- None
- Open access
- Yes
- Read the paper
- doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2025-0191
Original abstract
Objectives: Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) commonly affects adolescent and young women in educational settings, making it an important public health issue. Lifestyle is one of the essential subjects in health. This study assesses how PMS affects the lifestyle of young and adolescent students. Methods: This analytical cross-sectional study utilized a multi-stage cluster sampling method to recruit 450 students from various faculties at Babol University of Medical Sciences. The data collection instruments were self-administered questionnaires that captured variables related to demographics, fertility, anthropometry, premenstrual symptoms screening tool (PSST), and health-promoting lifestyle profile (HPLP). All instruments were completed by the student participants. For all statistical analyses, the threshold for significance was set at p<0.05. Results: The results of this study showed that a significant percentage (81.1 %) experienced severe symptoms of PMS. The total lifestyle score was significantly higher in the non-PMS group (131.01 vs. 124.03, p=0.002). A significant negative correlation was reported between lifestyle scores and PSST (r=-0.236, p<0.001). On multiple regression analysis, the income satisfaction (β=-9.644, p=0.007) and PSST (β=-4.142, p=0.070) acted as negative predictors of lifestyle. On the other hand, dissatisfaction with income adequacy and PSST indicated a lower level of lifestyle. Conclusions: PMS had a tremendous impact on students' lifestyles. On the other hand, students who had PMS also had lower lifestyles. These results can help health policymakers to provide appropriate intervention strategies to reduce the severity of PMS and promote healthier lifestyles.
Reproduced under CC-BY.
Topics
Related studies
Randomised trial, 2026
Does aerobic or resistance exercise reduce anxiety in women with PMS?
Systematic review, 2025
Does teaching adolescent girls about their menstrual cycle and health help reduce period pain and PMS?
Systematic review, 2024
How common is premenstrual syndrome in Africa, and what factors increase the risk?
Randomised trial, 2023
Does zinc supplementation reduce PMS symptoms in women?
Systematic review, 2021
How common is PMDD among female students in Ethiopia?
Systematic review, 2020
How common is PMS among women of reproductive age in Ethiopia?