Skip to content

Survey study, 2003

Does a trimonthly birth control pill cost less than a regular pill?

Yes, trimonthly pills appear to save money for both society and individual women, but only if they cost about the same as regular pills.

Early or limited evidence 59 adult women taking standard birth control pills at a community gynecology office.

What they did

Researchers created three economic models using cost data from survey responses of 59 women taking standard birth control pills. They estimated annual costs for both trimonthly pills (which reduce periods to four per year) and standard birth control pills (which keep monthly periods).

What they found

Annual costs per person from society's perspective were $460 for trimonthly pills and $501 for standard pills, saving $41 per year. From the patient's perspective, trimonthly pills cost $95 per year and standard pills cost $136 per year, saving $41. Trimonthly pills remained cost-saving as long as their price did not exceed a 9% premium over standard pills. The savings depended heavily on how much trimonthly pills reduced the use of menstrual hygiene products.

What it means for you

Trimonthly pills could save money if priced similarly to regular pills, especially for patients. However, the savings depend on women using fewer menstrual products with less frequent periods, which may vary. This was an economic model based on survey data, not a study of how well the pills actually work.

$460

annual societal cost for trimonthly pills

$501

annual societal cost for standard pills

$41

annual patient savings with trimonthly pills

About the study

Original title
Economics of reducing menstruation with trimonthly-cycle oral contraceptive therapy: comparison with standard-cycle regimens
Authors
Braunstein JB, Hausfeld J, Hausfeld J et al.
Journal
Obstetrics and gynecology
Year
2003
Study design
Survey study
Participants
59
What was tested
Comparison of cost between trimonthly birth control pills and standard birth control pills.

Topics