Skip to content

Case-control study, 2023

Does micronutrient intake differ between female athletes with and without PMS?

Most nutrients showed no clear difference. Lower vitamin D intake tended to be associated with PMS, but this finding was not definite.

Early or limited evidence 30 female collegiate athletes, ages 18-22, not using contraceptives

What they did

Case-control study of 30 NCAA Division I female athletes, ages 18-22, not using contraceptives. Participants were classified as having PMS or not. They completed dietary logs 1 week before their projected menstruation. The logs were analyzed for calories, macronutrients, vitamin D, magnesium, and zinc.

What they found

23% of the athletes had PMS. No significant differences were found between the PMS and non-PMS groups for calories (2150 vs 2142 kcals), carbohydrates (278 vs 271g), protein (90 vs 100.2g), fats (77 vs 77.2g), or food groups. There was a statistical trend showing lower vitamin D intake in the PMS group (39.4 vs 66.0 IU), but no significant differences in magnesium (205.0 vs 173.0 mg) or zinc (11.0 vs 7.0 mg).

What it means for you

No clear link was found between magnesium, zinc intake and PMS. Lower vitamin D intake may be connected to PMS but the finding wasn't strong. The study was small and looked only at athletes, so results may not apply to all women.

23%

of athletes with PMS

39.4 vs 66.0 IU

vitamin D intake in PMS vs no PMS

30

total athletes

About the study

Original title
Micronutrient intake and premenstrual syndrome in female collegiate athletes
Authors
Pallante PI, Vega AC, Escobar A et al.
Journal
The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness
Year
2023
Study design
Case-control study
Participants
30
What was tested
Comparison of micronutrient intake in athletes with and without PMS

Topics