Study, 2014
Does team-based learning help medical students understand PMS and related conditions?
Medical students in teams scored much higher on tests (averaging 94.33%) than when taking tests individually (averaging 72.80%), though they found applying the knowledge to complex cases harder (averaging 53.33%).
What they did
147 medical students divided into 26 teams participated in a team-based learning module. Students first studied materials on their own, then took an individual written test, then worked in their teams to answer the same test questions, and finally worked through complex case questions as a team.
What they found
Students averaged 72.80% on the individual test (ranging from 53% to 92%). When they worked in teams on the same test, they averaged 94.33% (ranging from 86% to 99%). On the complex application exercise, teams averaged 53.33% (ranging from 60% to 100%).
What it means for you
This shows that medical students learn better when they work together than when working alone. However, this study is about how doctors are trained, not about whether you can actually treat PMS better. The main limitation is that this measures test performance, not whether students actually help patients with PMS differently.
147
medical students
94.33%
average score on team test
72.80%
average score on individual test
About the study
- Original title
- Team-Based Learning: PMS vs. PMDD, Sexually Transmitted Infections, Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Menopause
- Authors
- Alice Chuang, Nancy N. Wang, Jeremy Belch
- Journal
- MedEdPORTAL
- Year
- 2014
- Study design
- Study
- Participants
- 147
- What was tested
- Team-based learning teaching module
- Open access
- Yes
- Read the paper
- doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9710
Original abstract
Abstract Introduction This team-based learning (TBL) module instructs obstetrics and gynecology clerkship students on diagnosis and initial management of premenstrual syndrome, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, sexually transmitted infections, pelvic organ prolapse, and menopause. This module is ideally suited for an active learning curriculum in which students are accustomed to preparing ahead of time and working through questions and cases in the classroom. Methods Students arrive at the session having read a series of prereadings. They first take a closed-book individual readiness assurance test (IRAT) to test their grasp of foundational information. They are then grouped into teams of five to seven students to complete the group readiness assurance test (GRAT), which is identical to the IRAT. The students remain in their teams as they complete an application exercise consisting of a case vignette and a number of complex multiple-choice questions. Results To date, 147 students making up 26 teams have completed the TBL module, with an average score of 72.80% (range: 53%-92%) on the IRAT, 94.33% (range: 86%-99%) on the GRAT, and 53.33% (range: 60%-100%) on the application exercise. Discussion We feel that TBL enables students to be more active learners compared to our previous didactic structure featuring PowerPoint-driven lectures. The advantages of this module are that (1) less faculty preparation time is needed, (2) students are actively engaged in application of the material, and (3) no traditional lecturing is required. Students are assessed using multiple-choice questions, and their group interactions are assessed by their peers. This module can be scaled to any size group greater than a minimum of 10 since students form teams of five to seven for the exercise.
Reproduced under CC-BY.
Topics
Related studies
Systematic review, 2025
How common are PMS, PMDD, and painful periods in nursing students, and do they affect their schooling?
Lab study, 2026
Do core stability exercises help women with PMDD?
Cohort study, 2026
Does the menstrual cycle phase affect how much physical activity women do?
Survey study, 2016
How many high school students in Japan miss school due to premenstrual symptoms and what increases the risk?
Survey study, 2024
What types of premenstrual syndrome exist and how common are they?
Survey study, 2023
What percentage of women aged 20-35 have PMS symptoms and what types are most common?