The glow on the right is papers published each year. It reaches 754 in 2025.
A river of light from 1931 to 2026. It passes through four eras: 1931 to 1976, A name, little science; 1977 to 1993, Women left out; 1994 to 2012, For further study; 2013 to 2026, Recognized.
Shaded spans mark 69 years from first description to first medicine, 1931 to 2000; 26 years in the manual’s appendix, 1987 to 2013; 16 years out of early drug trials, 1977 to 1993.
Papers published each year stay low until the 1980s and reach 754 in 2025.
Women’s health research timeline: how slow progress has been
Doctors described the days before a period in 1931. The first medicine approved for PMDD
came in 2000, and PMDD became a full diagnosis in 2013. This is the whole story on one page,
with a source under every step.
Does this sound familiar?
If any of these sound like your life, you’re not imagining it, and it isn’t your fault. Each
one has a history.
You’ve been told it’s just PMS.
PMDD has been a full diagnosis only since 2013. For 26 years before that, its criteria sat in the appendix of the psychiatric manual.
It takes a week of every month, and it still gets treated as a small thing.
A 2024 global report put the economic value of addressing PMS at $115 billion. In NIH’s 2025 fiscal year, 10 funded projects mentioned PMDD in their title or summary.
2.4 years. The average wait for a diagnosis among people who noticed symptoms after
PMDD became official in 2013. For those who noticed them before, it was 12.3 years.
Border and Miller, 2026, Health Services Insights
209 papers. Research on PMDD published in 2025, against
46 in 2000. See the chart.
36 trials. PMS and PMDD clinical trials that started in 2025, against
5 in 2020. See the chart.
1931 to 1976
A name, and very little science
Doctors described the days before a period in medical journals, gave it a name, and mostly moved on.
1931
A gynecologist describes “premenstrual tension”
Robert T. Frank publishes “The hormonal causes of premenstrual tension” in the Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry.
Why it mattered It gives the week before a period a medical name and looks for a physical cause, in hormones.
Raymond Greene and Katharina Dalton publish “The premenstrual syndrome” in the British Medical Journal. They choose “syndrome” over “tension” because the symptoms reach well past tension.
Why it mattered It’s the name most people still use. A name made the condition easier to talk about. It didn’t make it easier to treat.
For 16 years, FDA advice kept most women who could become pregnant out of the earliest drug trials. When NIH asked researchers to include women, its own auditors found the request wasn’t working.
1977
The FDA advises keeping women out of early drug trials
After the thalidomide tragedy, an FDA guideline says women who could become pregnant should be excluded from Phase 1 and early Phase 2 studies, unless the drug is for a life-threatening illness.
Why it mattered “Could become pregnant” was read to include women on contraception and women with sterile partners. The FDA and researchers now describe the guideline as “rigid and paternalistic.”
The American Psychiatric Association’s DSM-III-R lists “late luteal phase dysphoric disorder” in Appendix A: at least five symptoms that start before a period and ease once it begins.
Why it mattered Researchers could finally agree on who they were studying. It stayed outside the main manual for the next 26 years.
Government auditors find NIH’s policy isn’t working
In June 1990, the GAO tells Congress that NIH’s policy on including women “has not been well communicated or understood within NIH or the research community.”
Why it mattered It also found NIH officials had taken little action on asking researchers to analyze results by gender.
The NIH Revitalization Act requires NIH to include women and minorities in all the clinical research it funds, unless there’s a compelling scientific reason not to, and to design trials so results can be analyzed by sex.
Why it mattered It also wrote the Office of Research on Women’s Health into law.
On July 22, 1993, a new FDA guideline lifts the restriction on most women who could become pregnant joining Phase 1 and early Phase 2 trials, and encourages them to take part.
Why it mattered Pregnancy testing and contraception counseling took the place of a blanket rule. The guideline also asks drug makers to consider how the stage of the menstrual cycle affects a drug, where they can.
Still “for further study”, and the first medicines
PMDD got its name and its first approved treatments while the psychiatric manual still listed it as needing more research.
1994
It’s renamed premenstrual dysphoric disorder
DSM-IV renames late luteal phase dysphoric disorder as PMDD and keeps it in Appendix B, “Criteria Sets and Axes Provided for Further Study.”
Why it mattered Clear criteria helped research grow. The experts who later proposed moving it into the main manual said that would give it “greater legitimacy.”
The difference is in the response, not the hormones
In an NIH study in the New England Journal of Medicine, women with PMS felt better when their ovarian hormones were switched off, and their symptoms came back when estrogen or progesterone was added. Women without PMS had no mood change on the same hormones.
Why it mattered The authors concluded the symptoms are “an abnormal response to normal hormonal changes.” The 2017 gene study below builds on this.
Sertraline (May 2002), paroxetine CR (August 2003) and the birth control pill drospirenone with ethinyl estradiol, sold as YAZ (October 2006), are approved for PMDD.
Why it mattered Every medicine with PMDD on its FDA label today is one of these two kinds: an SSRI, or a drospirenone pill.
From January 25, 2016, NIH expects “sex as a biological variable” to be built into the design, analysis and reporting of the animal and human studies it funds.
Why it mattered It came 23 years after the law on clinical trials, and carried the same idea into lab research.
NIH scientists grow cells from women with PMDD and from women without it, and find differences in a gene complex, ESC/E(Z), that responds to estrogen and progesterone.
Why it mattered It’s evidence, at the level of cells, that PMDD involves a real difference in how the body responds to normal hormones.
The World Health Assembly adopts ICD-11 in May 2019, in effect from January 1, 2022. PMDD is listed as GA34.41.
Why it mattered ICD codes are what health records and health statistics use. The entry says symptoms should ideally be confirmed with a daily diary over at least two cycles.
An analysis of NIH funding against disease burden finds that in nearly three-quarters of diseases that mostly affect one sex, the funding pattern favors males.
Why it mattered When a disease mostly affects women, it tends to get less research money than its burden would call for.
The World Economic Forum and McKinsey Health Institute report that women spend 25% more of their lives in poor health than men, and that NIH spends 11% of its budget on research specific to women’s health.
Why it mattered It lists PMS among ten conditions whose treatment would make up more than half the economic gain of closing the gap, and puts PMS alone at $115 billion.
A meta-analysis of 44 studies and 50,659 people finds PMDD in 3.2% when the diagnosis is confirmed with daily ratings, and 1.6% in community samples with a confirmed diagnosis.
Why it mattered Studies that skipped daily ratings found 7.7%. The authors say rates from those studies are likely “artificially high.”
In an Australian study of 267 people who sought PMDD care, those who noticed symptoms before 2013 waited 12.3 years on average for a diagnosis. Those who noticed them later waited 2.4 years.
Why it mattered Only 19% were diagnosed the recommended way, with daily ratings over two cycles. Part of the drop is timing, since newer cases haven’t had as long to wait.
Each bar is one year of published papers on PMS, PMDD and closely related conditions. Before 1983,
no year had 100. In 2025 there were 754, and 28% of them
were about PMDD.
All other papersAbout PMDD2026 so far
1931 First described1953 PMS named1987 First criteria2000 First medicine2013 Full diagnosis
200
400
600
800
1930194019501960197019801990200020102020
165 papers in 1987, when the first criteria appeared. 192 in 2000, the year of the first approved medicine. 213 in 2013, when PMDD became a full diagnosis. The dashed bar is 2026 up to October 13.See every number
Year
Papers
About PMDD
1930
2
0
1931
1
0
1932
1
0
1933
1
0
1938
1
0
1939
2
0
1940
1
0
1941
1
0
1942
3
0
1943
6
0
1944
1
0
1945
5
0
1946
6
0
1947
5
0
1948
3
0
1949
6
0
1950
12
0
1951
24
0
1952
12
0
1953
32
0
1954
20
0
1955
28
0
1956
26
0
1957
27
0
1958
26
0
1959
39
0
1960
27
0
1961
26
0
1962
30
0
1963
50
0
1964
55
0
1965
29
0
1966
29
0
1967
26
0
1968
38
0
1969
35
0
1970
31
0
1971
42
0
1972
33
0
1973
31
0
1974
43
0
1975
52
0
1976
50
0
1977
51
1
1978
41
1
1979
72
0
1980
65
0
1981
70
0
1982
87
0
1983
103
2
1984
96
3
1985
132
2
1986
131
3
1987
165
3
1988
166
5
1989
190
14
1990
179
9
1991
156
7
1992
157
18
1993
151
9
1994
151
13
1995
167
25
1996
130
19
1997
184
42
1998
169
26
1999
186
44
2000
192
46
2001
210
58
2002
209
70
2003
184
53
2004
178
51
2005
188
51
2006
203
55
2007
184
54
2008
219
65
2009
203
43
2010
206
52
2011
210
59
2012
205
58
2013
213
51
2014
264
60
2015
241
46
2016
253
54
2017
295
70
2018
314
68
2019
294
71
2020
344
77
2021
393
86
2022
492
123
2023
560
145
2024
581
160
2025
754
209
2026 (so far)
736
224
Clinical trials, by the year they started
Registered trials on PMS, PMDD and closely related conditions. 161 of
the 280 started in 2022 or later.
Trials started2026 so far
10
20
30
40
200020052010201520202025
6 more trials started before 2000, 1 is planned to start after 2026 and 1 has no start date. ClinicalTrials.gov opened in 2000, so earlier trials are undercounted.See every number
Year
Trials started
2000
4
2001
2
2002
3
2003
1
2004
7
2005
7
2006
1
2007
2
2008
5
2009
5
2010
4
2011
5
2012
3
2013
7
2014
3
2015
10
2016
5
2017
4
2018
8
2019
8
2020
5
2021
12
2022
29
2023
33
2024
35
2025
36
2026 (so far)
28
About these numbers
Papers come from Europe PMC, PubMed and OpenAlex, with retracted papers left out. Trials
come from ClinicalTrials.gov and the ISRCTN registry. Both run to October 13, 2026.
ClinicalTrials.gov opened in 2000, so older
trials are missing.
Medical publishing grew in every field over these decades, so the shape of the bars says
more than their height. You can read the papers themselves in the research
library, or just the PMDD studies.
What this means for you today
The slow part was the science and the funding. The diagnosis itself is now settled, and that
changes what you can ask for.
PMDD is an official diagnosis
It’s in the DSM-5 and in the WHO’s ICD-11 as GA34.41. If a doctor seems unsure, those two names are worth bringing up.